
Originally Posted by
Celebrity Killing Spree
I'm an artist. I start projects all of the time that moved aside or are adapted into something else or are abandoned entirely. I don't think it's weird or abnormal or unprofessional. My mind moves quickly and I jump from idea to the next at the mercy of inspiration. I suspect that Manson works in a similar way. It's hard to ignore new sources of inspiration and newer, better ideas to work one project to completion at a time. A lot of the time it's counter-creative and can lead to some shitty and uninspired art. Is it better to finish a project for the sake of finishing it or to allow your creativity to take you where it will and eventually come up with something, down the line, you are proud of? Likewise, I don't fault him wanting to share his excitement over the new potential projects he comes up with. And who knows, maybe it really isn't always his fault that they never see the light of day.
Consider this: 1) When dealing with all of the intricacies of producing/funding or planning a film there are a lot of things simply beyond the artists control that can sink a project. Funding/contracts/availability/copyrights/cancellations...
2) How do we know that we haven't seen a lot of this material already? Who is to say that aspects of the celebritarian concept or the factory or whatever haven't been absorbed into what we've already seen since then?
3) Maybe some this of this stuff just turned out to be shit and he dropped it to work on something better.
4) There are a lot of people complaining who have never done anything creative in their lives that like to pretend that they know what it's like.