Well with a book title like that we have to talk about it, right? Better yet, get this; the opening passage is even more relevant.
Over fifteen years have passed since Wilson Bryan Key first warned us to 'Watch ourselves!' much as the Greek god Zeus once cautioned Narcissus."
But that's not enough. Before the foreword is a quote in the dedication section.
"'There's no use trying,' said Alice. 'One can't believe impossible things.'
I daresay you haven't had much practice,' said the Queen. 'When I was your age, I always did it for half-an-hour a day. Why, sometimes I've believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast.'"
Yeah. An Alice quote. In a book that obviously has some significance to Deep Six. So, what's this book about? Manipulation of the masses via the media, not only in subliminal messages, but for various purposes in various ways. One section specifically talks religion, and the use of it for getting rich. A lovely quote:
"If the communist menace suddenly disappeared, many US politicians would become unemployable. They would quickly have to come up with a new menace."
Communist menace? Oh yeah, did I forget to mention this was released in 1989? At the same time a young Brian Hugh Warner was finding himself, finding his beliefs, and his contempt for the media especially. The section that quote comes from talks about how public patriotism or religion is done to be seen, done not for one's belief, but for the admiration they get from others for their actions. The book also talks about how it has been shown that those believe themselves to be the most independent and uncontrollable and individualistic are often the easiest to control with manipulation. Which heavily independent and individualistic person has been played and betrayed by those closest to him multitudes of times?
While some of us may disagree with the book due to history of panics regarding subliminal messages, it's obvious Manson has read it, and likely rather close to the release, seeing as it and the three previous books by the author were quite popular in colleges. However, something more interesting, despite being more of a psychology book, it was, quite ironically used in advertising classes, as to warn about something you have to teach it, and so the book both warns and shows you what they're doing and therefore teaches you how to do it. Manson may have been a journalism major at the time, but his best friend and band co-founder was an advertising major, which means it's quite possible that Daisy/Scott could have introduced him to the book.
Now, I haven't finished the book, but it's been a good read so far, and after hitting post I'm going to go back to reading it. For those of you interested, I uploaded it to my Google Drive so you can download it.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwO...ew?usp=sharing
And now I have pretty much proof he read this book a long time ago, from one quote:
"Marshall McLuhan described projections as 'Narcissus Narcosis.' As we perceive endless hours of media involvement, we unconsciously project and identify with heroes against villains"
This section is discussing how people take their own issues, their own internal worries and emotions and project them on others, like a cheating or fantasising about cheating spouse believing their spouse is infidelious. If the phrase "Narcissus Narcosis" sounds familiar, it's a Holy Wood song. Further more, as we know, Narcissus is brought up again in Deep Six.
The term "Narcissus Narcosis" is about the fact that this projection on endless media numbs them to reality. By projecting themselves on to the heroes, they numb themselves to real life, only seeing themselves as the hero and their foes as the villain. In Manson's case, he was their target, their born villain, after Columbine.
The next passage is brilliant.
"The design and staging of rock groups provide another example of projective identification. Images are engineered by sophisticated music investment corporations to be instantly revolting to parents and evoke panic about their children's welfare. For the immature audiences, the group must project their defiance of parental supervision and moral restrictions and offer an affront to authority figures of all types. The engineering of rock music and the groups who play it focuses on the instabilities inherent in the ages of their fans. Heavy metal rock groups, for example, are designed to project a fantasy of Satan as savior for neurosis-prone, lower-working-class teenagers. Heavy metal has made enormous profits for record companies but has promoted suicide and antisocial violence as an answer to adolescent problems"
Sound familiar? It gets better with a quote from an NME interview about The Pale Emperor
"'The redneck in me comes out in my voice, and its got some old blues mixed with the very hard elements,' he said. 'I want to retain what I think is good about the past, what music I did and who I am. It's not about being pissed about the world – it's about realising someone has to fuck things up.'"
He openly chose the path described above, in this book he clearly read a long time ago and influenced him. While the book has a cynical view on it, however, Manson obviously doesn't see it as preying on them for profit, but giving them something to identify with, something to look up to, and something to help them decide for themselves by telling them not to just listen to him. He's taken his power over people to fight back against those with power over people, himself included.
Check out page 105 (62 in the PDF, 105 at the bottom). It's really interesting and pretty important.
Honestly, typing everything out is exhausting. Perhaps this little passage is unimportant, but the phrase used makes me wonder, so I'll post it.
In case there's a bit of confusion/forgetfulness, "FUCK IT!" is the opening to Irresponsible Hate Anthem.
The part after that talks about how high-order abstractions like "love" and "god" have different meanings to everyone and how it's weird that everyone demands people agree with theirs.
The book makes the argument that an objective truth is impossible, as defining it automatically makes it subjective, and so an objective truth would have to exist outside of definition, which is a logical paradox. Yes, I'm basically liveblogging a book. I'm pathetic, I know. Go read it and let's discuss what it means in relation to Manson. It's a good book even without that.
Part Two, or An Argument For This Being The Celebritarian Bible
Part Three, or Jesus' Giant Throbbing Penis
Part Four, or The Fall of The House of Death