Not a trick question; just curious as to how people perceive things.
Can a negation of a negation negate that quality which was initially negated?
Not a trick question; just curious as to how people perceive things.
Can a negation of a negation negate that quality which was initially negated?
Not a trick question; just curious as to how people perceive things.
L0L
what . . the . . . fuck
"Fake realities will create fake humans. Or, fake humans will generate fake realities and sell them to other humans, turning them, eventually, into forgeries of themself" -Philip K. Dick
It obviously depends entirely on what that original quality was, or what it pertained to. But generally, the stages of argument you've suggested will result in a 'No', because in challenging a disagreement, you'll likely end up supporting the initial criteria.
Why is this place so fucking retarded all the time
and with just one faint glance back into the sea
the mollusk lingers with its wandering eye
Because you and several others take this place too seriously, hate it, yet are on it a great deal. That and people are either obnoxious and see having a sense of humor as being vapid, vacuous and trolling.
I have a question for you. Why do you say "Um" so much? You're starting to remind me of "Comic Book Guy" from The Simpsons. What happened to you man? Collective Soul, man. You're fucking jaded. You were much more cool whenever you lived in a trailer in the desert.
OMNOMNOMNOMNOMNOMNOM